[ About Us | Popular | Marcom | AdNet | IChannel | Glossary ]

May 4, 2008

NEWS: Publisher Tested the Waters Online, Then Dove In

Ed: Great news from my old friends at IDG. 

Publisher Tested the Waters Online, Then Dove In

By STEVE LOHR
Published: May 5, 2008

It may be a niche publisher, but the International Data Group has been working out the answers to some big mainstream questions. The biggest one: Can print media survive the transition to the Internet?

The question has taken on new urgency lately. A faltering economy is heightening the pressure on newspapers and magazines to find a sustaining future online, as the flight of readers and advertisers to the Web accelerates.

Just last week, The Capital Times, a 90-year-old daily newspaper in Madison, Wis., ended its print version and began publishing only online.

The journey beyond print is uncertain and perilous, but the experience of I.D.G., the world’s largest publisher of technology newspapers and magazines, suggests that it can be done. A privately held company, whose magazines include Computerworld, InfoWorld, PC World, Macworld and CIO, it appears to have made a profitable migration to the Internet, with revenue from online ads now surpassing print revenue.

Advertisers and readers of high-tech publications have moved online more swiftly than other audiences, so I.D.G. may offer a glimpse of the future of publishing. Yet the transition at I.D.G. came only after years of investment, upheaval and changes in its practice of journalism.

“The excellent thing, and good news, for publishers is that there is life after print — in fact, a better life after print,” said Patrick J. McGovern, the founder and chairman of I.D.G.

The biggest single step in the company’s online shift came on April 2, 2007, when the last print edition of InfoWorld appeared and it became a Web-only publication. InfoWorld, a weekly, started out as Intelligent Machines Journal in 1978; I.D.G. bought it a year later, and it has long been one of the company’s flagship magazines.

There were nervous months after the switch as the company awaited the reaction from advertisers and readers, but before long InfoWorld’s Web audience was growing and its business improved. Today, I.D.G. says, the InfoWorld Web site is generating ad revenue of $1.6 million a month with operating profit margins of 37 percent. A year earlier, when it had both print and online versions, InfoWorld had a slight operating loss on monthly revenue of $1.5 million.

Across the company, the remaining print publications still typically play a vital role, but a lesser one — physically smaller and financially diminished. In 2002, 86 percent of the revenue from I.D.G.’s publications came from print and 14 percent online. These days, 52 percent of the revenue is from online ads, while 48 percent is from the print side.

Last year, print and online publications accounted for 70 percent of I.D.G.’s $3 billion in revenue, with the rest coming from its conference business and its technology research firm, I.D.C.

The giant technology publisher has not just stabilized its business, Mr. McGovern said, but is also now growing at about 10 percent a year — though a severe recession would surely dim its growth prospects this year.

Throughout its far-flung network of 300 print publications and 450 Web sites in 85 countries, I.D.G. has converted smaller magazines to online only, but InfoWorld was the big one. More will come, company executives say, as print magazines slip into the red and are left behind. But they emphasize that the print versions of some publications like CIO, a glossy twice-monthly magazine, are likely to be around for many years.

CIO (for chief information officer) is distributed free to senior technology managers. It is solidly profitable and runs long articles that detail the use of technology in corporations and government institutions. A recent issue included a nine-page article on the effort to use computerized records to improve health care in California’s prison system, under a court-ordered program.

Yet even CIO has adopted what its managers call an “online first” business model. Three years ago, the editorial staff was divided into three people who worked on the Web site only and the rest only on print. Today, there are no print and Web barriers. The total staff size, at 23, is one fewer than in 2005, but now most of them spend 80 percent of their time on the Web, while a handful of writers spend 80 percent of their time on the long centerpiece articles in the print magazine.

(Page 2 of 2)

But everyone writes for the Web these days. “It’s only fair to people for their career development,” said Michael Friedenberg, the president of CIO. “How can you say to anyone, in this environment, that they can only write in print and not online?”

The most striking change, though, has occurred at more news-oriented publications like InfoWorld, the former weekly, given the Internet’s ability to deliver news instantly to readers and deliver narrowly defined audiences to advertisers.

When Robert Carrigan, the executive in charge of I.D.G. media properties, met with the senior business managers of InfoWorld in February last year, the only thing left to decide was the death date for the print edition. With a controlled circulation of 180,000 copies, the print edition was losing money, while investment and resources had shifted to the InfoWorld Web site. “We were eager to evolve the business and prove what we felt deep down, that we could move beyond print,” Mr. Carrigan said.

There was little surprise in the editorial ranks either. By then, the editorial staff was down to its current level of 17 people, about half the number in 2002, and way below the peak of nearly 100 during the technology spending boom of the late 1990s. The separation of the print and online staffs had ended long before.

Steve Fox, the editor in chief of InfoWorld at the time, said that the most fundamental difference between print and online was the ability to measure precisely how many readers view a particular article on the Web — and how those results influence editorial decisions on what to write about.

The link to the business is direct. When a person views a Web page, ads are automatically presented on the page and the publisher collects a payment.

“It’s wonderful to have the feedback that you get online, but you need enlightened ownership so that you are not a slave to page views,” said Mr. Fox, who left amicably last October to join a social networking start-up.

At InfoWorld, page views are important, said Eric Knorr, the current editor in chief, but as a guide rather than a substitute for editorial judgment. Predictably, he added, certain topics that stir strong opinions among technology readers produce spikes in traffic. “If we were chasing page views, all we’d ever write about is H1-B visas for tech workers, Macs and how bad Microsoft is,” Mr. Knorr said.

Yet as a Web-only publication, InfoWorld is very different from the bygone print edition. Gone, Mr. Knorr says, are the long pieces of more than 3,000 words, with anecdotes and narrative, examining how technology had transformed some company or industry. Instead, he said, the key online is packaging information into “digestible chunks,” typically of no more than a page of text or so, sometimes in lists of “10 things to do” to solve some technology problem in companies.

The Web, Mr. Knorr said, also opens the door to offerings that are impossible in print. He pointed to short animations that explain complex technologies, and an online petition urging Microsoft to keep selling the aging Windows XP operating system beyond its June cutoff date, which has collected 160,000 names.

Without the physical limitations of print, Mr. Knorr said, it becomes easier to explore topics more deeply. InfoWorld presents a stable of bloggers, including 19 freelance writers, who are authorities in niches including data protection, green technology, open source software and cloud computing.

The goal, with reporting and blogging, Mr. Knorr said, is to create “thought leadership and depth” in several subject areas online, and also set up InfoWorld conferences around those topics.

The approach, it seems, resonates with the advertising industry. “Print brands are going to continue to live, but the distribution channels are certainly changing and so is the content,” said Latha Sundaram, a senior vice president at Starcom Worldwide, an advertising buyer. “InfoWorld has focused on the depth of information in technology that is best presented in an online format.”

Stewart Alsop, a journalist turned venture capitalist, was the editor in chief of InfoWorld in the 1990s, when it was thick with ads and its editorial staff was at its peak. “Technology publishing just happens to be at the point of this whole transformation of media,” Mr. Alsop said. “What’s happening at I.D.G. is a fairly accurate map for every other publishing organization. Get over it, it’s going to happen.”


NEWS: Who Will Microsoft Buy Now With the $50 Billion Change Left? AOL? Facebook?

Who Will Microsoft Buy Now With the $50 Billion Change Left? AOL? Facebook?

AllThingsDigital -- WSJ by 
Despite the fact that Microsoft has withdrawn its offer to buy Yahoo, the M&A machinery on all sides is still in full gear, and expect tons of activity in the next couple of months. The $50 billion or so that Microsoft was willing to spend is the money that’s still around, at least on paper. So who will Microsoft buy to make that leap it so hoped for?

Microsoft now has $50 billion burning a hole in its pocket…

from VentureBeat by 

Okay, Microsoft’s attempt to buy Yahoo fell apart — so now what? Well, in his letter to Microsoft employees, chief executive Steve Ballmer says that Microsoft will be just fine going forward without Yahoo. As a company, that may be true. But what about its long term goal of taking the lead online?

If current trends hold, Microsoft is not going to be overtaken by Google in the online realm. It needs to either step up its game or purchase some other big name Internet companies. Luckily, it just saved itself about $50 billion today.

So the question now is, who will Microsoft buy? Already, quite a few people are pointing to AOL. It’s a fairly obvious choice. Time Warner badly wants to spin them off, and they have held talk with none other than Yahoo about a potential merger. While AOL has long been looked down upon in the Web 2.0 world, there are some signs that it could be turning itself around in a meaningful way.

Beyond AOL (and of course Yahoo and Google), Ballmer himself has noted there aren’t too many really large Internet companies out there. Social networks Facebook and MySpace both certainly qualify, but MySpace still has an ad deal with Google and Microsoft already owns a piece of its main rival, Facebook. Could Microsoft try to buy a larger portion, and thus more influence, in Facbeook?

Here’s another idea on a smaller scale: Digg. Microsoft has an advertising deal with the social voting news site already, and can certainly afford the rumored $200-300 million Digg is looking for to sell. As to how that would go over with the Digg community…well, lets just say those Flickr protests(Yahoo owns Flickr and its users were unhappy over the proposed takeover) would probably look pretty tame when compared to what we’d see on Digg.

So here another idea: Twitter. The online micro messaging service could likely be had for what Microsoft would consider pocket change — even the highest valuations are “only” $150 million. There would be a lot of questions as to what Microsoft would actually do with Twitter (as well as what anyone actually does with Twitter), but it would certainly be a nice, buzz-worthy purchase in the short term.

What about another buzzed about service, FriendFeed? Given that most of FriendFeed’s core team comes from Google (with more coming every day), it seems unlikely they’d want to sell to Microsoft.

Who else? Maybe Meebo, the IM service recently pegged at $250 million? The $560 million valued Ning? We’re really just throwing names out there now based on high valuations. It’s simply hard to say what Microsoft will do at this point, but you can bet it will do something — soon.

Who Will Microsoft Buy Now With the $50 Billion Change Left? AOL? Facebook?

paidContent.org by 

Despite the fact that Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT) has withdrawn its offer to buy Yahoo (NSDQ: YHOO), the M&A machinery on all sides is still in full gear, and expect tons of activity in the next couple of months. The $50 billion or so that Microsoft was willing to spend is the money that's still around, at least on paper. So who will Microsoft buy to make that leap it so hoped for? Steve Ballmer hinted the readiness in his letter to Jerry Yang: "We will move forward and will continue to innovate and grow our business at Microsoft with the talented team we have in place andpotentially through strategic transactions with other business partners."

Some possible combinations: 
-- One would have to believe that Facebook will be back in play. Microsoft is already the advertising provider for the social networking service, and also owns a small part in it. This would give it a strong toe-hold in the social media space and help it experiment more with new advertising models, among other things. 
-- Then, to block and isolate Yahoo further, AOL's (NYSE: TWX) buyout would be a possibility. Time Warner is certainly interested in spinning it out, and is still speaking to Yahoo on a combination. Google (NSDQ: GOOG) is a 5 percent shareholder of AOL, so things might have to worked around that. 
-- Certainly, if Diller really wants to get rid of IAC's (NSDQ: IACI) disparate companies in this spinoff, then Microsoft could be a ready buyer. 
-- Then other smaller possibility include CNET (NSDQ: CNET), though hard to see synergies between the two companies. 
-- Further down the money chain would be tons of other companies like Twitter, Digg, Meebo and any other $50 million to $500 million company. 


Ed: Microsoft needs to focus on its enterprise roots. Moving toward consumer services via Yahoo made no sense. It's a mismatch with their brand image. 

Ning, Saleforce.com, or a mash-up of enterprise-focused services would better fit Microsoft's long term image.

 
BRAND: Microsoft==Evil Empire, the Branding Problem 
 
ANALYSIS: Where's the ROI on Google, Microsoft's Investments on Targeting 
 
NEWS: Microsoft acquires equity stake in Facebook, expands ad partnership 
 
NEWS: Microsoft Wants Yahoo
If Mr. Ballmer insists on a consumer play, it would be better to purchase an emerging brand and assign all the consumer facing services to the new division.

NEWS ANALYSIS
A Step Back for Microsoft

Microsoft walked away from a Yahoo deal still looking for an answer to its fundamental problem: its time-tested recipe for success isn’t working against Google.

After Deal Dies, Yahoo Weighs Its Next Move
After Deal Dies, Yahoo Weighs Its Next Move

As Yahoo investors wait to see how far their shares will fall after Microsoft withdrew its offer, a Google partnership is being considered as a lifeline.

A Yahoo Shareholder on What Might Have Been

“Press reports that major shareholders would have been wiling to take $35 are probably not far off the mark,” said Bill Miller, Yahoo’s second-largest shareholder.


BRAND: Yahoo==Alice in Wonderland, a little lost

The web 1.0 leader worries about survival as a stand-alone property. Wall Street cares about growth and Yahoo has lost market share during the web 2.0 resurgence.


The Semel-years led Yahoo toward better financial management, but poor strategic thinking. Rather than investing in the infrastructure of people, platforms, and innovation - the company moved toward content and services - a dead-end that competes with millions of media partners - and a goal where it's impossible dominate the world of opinions

Post-Semel, the company has had too many ideas. 360, AMP, Broadcast, Buzz, Del.icio.us, Geocities, Jajah, My Bookmark, MyBlogLog, Shine, Yahoo Auctions, Yahoo Directory, Yahoo Music, Yahoo! Open Strategy, Yahoo Pipes, YPN, Yahoo Video, Yahooligans - too many me-too projects, too little results.  

What's next? 370? Shinola? Twitt-oo?



Web 2.0 is not a tea party - it's a war. Choose your fronts and remember to win.

PS: Microsoft has lost interest in Yahoo. Will Yahoo be distracted by shareholder politics? Will the stock price tank? Will strategic partners question Yahoo's credibility? Difficult times for Yahoo ahead - they need a win.

Who Is Buying Yahoo Shares Today?

...Mr. Yang boasted of the company’s first-quarter results, which were slightly ahead of analysts’ expectations, and its recent crop of “innovative products and services that really move the needle and make a difference for our users and customers”:

Acquiring Maven Networks. Launching BuzzOneSearch 2.0, voice-activated mobile searchvideo on FlickrShine. Previewing AMP! from Yahoo! and SearchMonkey. Addingmore Newspaper Consortium members. Establishing our New R&D labs in India and Israel.

SearchMonkey—a method to open Yahoo’s search engine to outsiders—is interesting. The AMP! Platform and Newspaper Consortium represent anemerging strategy to build out Yahoo’s display advertising business...


Support Our Sponsors: