Comscore (SCOR) has had it up to its eyeballs with being blamed for blowing Google's quarter (GOOG). A week after a company blog post failed to quiet screams that inaccurate Google click data had cost investors millions, Comscore's CEO Magid Abraham sends an even more strongly worded email to clients. The bottom line? Dr. Magid Abraham, Comscore CEO: When Google announced strong Q1 earnings last week, some financial and media analysts wrote thatcomScore’s reports of slowing growth in Google’s paid clicks missed the mark. That conclusion is patently false. Unfortunately, many pundits attempted to draw conclusions about Google’s worldwiderevenue performance based on comScore’s domestic paid click data, resulting in an apples-to-oranges comparison. Had they used comScore's domestic paid click data to better understand Google's domestic revenue trends, they wouldn't have missed an important U.S. story and they also likely would have avoided making the wrong call onGoogle’s worldwide business. Following several historical quarters of strong sequential domestic revenue growth (including the seasonally equivalent Q1 2007), Google’s Q1 2008 revenue growth was essentially flat, which represented a significant change for Google’s domestic business. Such an important trend was also evident in comScore’s paid click data. The chart below shows the directional association between comScore’s domestic paid click trends, as compared to Google’s domestic revenue trends. [The chart can also be viewed at the following link:http://www.comscore.com/images/google_us.gif] President and CEO comScore, Inc.Comscore: Actually, We Were Right. And Google's US Business Stinks
Of course, this is not a perfect correlation because the comScore data do not include the impact of changes in Google’s price per click and do not include paid clicks from partner sites like AOL, Ask, Washington Post, etc. nor paid clicks from the AdSense network. But the strong relationship of the two trends is undeniable.
There is of course a lesson to be learned here. To extrapolate a single data point across all aspects of a company's business can lead to wildly inaccurate conclusions.
Finally, to confirm the accuracy of the comScore paid click data, we previously published an apples-to-apples reconciliation on this blog. This analysis reconciles thecomScore data with metrics shown in Google’s Q1, 2008 financial report. In short,comScore got it right – both quantitatively and qualitatively. What was wrong were the conclusions that some people drew based on inherently flawed comparisons.
Dr. Magid Abraham
Apr 24, 2008
Comscore: Actually, We Were Right. And Google's US Business Stinks
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts - Tag and Earn More
- Apple on a Roll
- Understanding Facebook for Web 1.0 Users
- eBook, Self-Publishing, Starving Writers Gain Ad-Supported ePublishing
- New Media: The Problem is Monetization, The Solution is $50.00+ eCPM
- Profiling the Internet and Online Advertising
- Contextual, Behavioral, and AI Targeting
- Internet Consolidation or Fragmentation
- New Internet Roles with Social Media
- Blogging Ecosystem of Distribution Gadgets
- SEO or 'Flypaper Effect'
- Reality Television Comes to Journalism - Thy Name is Blogger
- Feeds, Weeds, Reads, and User Needs
- Sex, Money, Power - The Anchor of Social Media
- Forum: Anyone able to earn $100+ eCPM
- Lead Generation, Direct Mail, eMail, Word-of-Mouth, Buzz Marketing, Social Media Compared
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments accepted immediately, but moderated.